Grand Jury: Day 8 – Closing Arguments Reiner Fuellmich & Jury Voting
SOURCE: UK RELOADED [Go to source for video)
POSTED BY STEVE COOK
The following article is taken, with thanks, from our sister-site, Europe Reloaded
ER Editor: With much gratitude to our colleague, Dutch journalist Michel van der Kemp, who has kindly provided a transcription of Reiner Fuellmich’s Closing Arguments. The video continues with contributions by other members of his legal team at around the 51:00 minute mark. The video lasts for almost 3.5 hours.
We are now being invited to vote on Telegram in a simple ‘yes’ or ‘no’ fashion. See below for the link.
********
Grand Jury: Day 8 – Closing Arguments Reiner Füllmich & Jury Voting
MICHEL VAN DER KEMP
Members of the jury in the Court of Public Opinion are invited to cast their votes on the Corona Committee telegram channel.
A direct link to the voting option:
https://t.me/CoronaInvestigativeCommittee/84
Voting will close at 2:45 p.m. CDT on June 16 and the results will be noted.
Watch the full Grand Jury sessions days 1-7 on Odysee HERE or on Internet Archive, with chapters and timestamps: Day 1, Opening statements, 05 February 2022 Day 2, General historical and geopolitical backdrop, 12 February 2022 Day 3, PCR test, 13 February 2022 Day 4, Injections, 19 February 2022 Day 5, Financial destruction, 20 February 2022 Day 6, Eugenics, closing arguments and outlook, 26 February 2022 Day 7, Psychology and Propaganda
[ https://odysee.com/@GrandJury:f/gj-day8en:3 ]
****
Day 8 of the Grand Jury gets opened by Viviane Fischer, who passes over to Judge Rui Fonseca E. Castro from Portugal.
Rui Fonseca E. Castro
[ 12:35 – 15:55 ]
Good evening. This is a summary of the last session of the Grand Jury model proceeding. First we had Dr. Matthias DeSmet, Professor at Gent University and a clinical psychologist; and Dr. Mark Miller, Professor at New York University. They talked about the phenomenon of mass formation and the role of the media to achieve this during the crisis of the fake Corona pandemic. Dr. Matthias DeSmet explained that mass formation is a specific kind of group formation, having a very specific impact on individual’s psychological functioning. One of the most common characteristics of people under the effect of mass formation is a suppression of their critical thinking, says DeSmet, allowing them to commit the most cruel and barbaric acts even against their once beloved family and friends. Technology now allows the elite with the collaboration of the media worldwide to be able to influence people in order to create mass formation that better fits for them to stay in power, even with politics that go against the populations. Since the mass formation doesn’t last very long unless the elite keeps feeding people with propaganda, the elite also needs to control the media, in order to maintain the bombardment with propaganda through news and advertising. By doing so the elite manage to execute measures that will isolate people and make individuals more vulnerable and disconnected from their social environment and also more obedient. That sums up what happened during these last two years.
So then we had Dr. Ulrike Kämmerer, Professor at Wurzburg University, expert in human biology, immunology and cellular biology, [who] explained how the PCR-test works, and why it is technologically not able to decide if a sample which is found positive is indicative of an infectious, contagious person. And even if performed under perfect conditions [the test] can’t be used as gold standard and by this from medical actions to stop the spread of a virus, since all the active material is destroyed in the process. [She] explained how the PCR-test with the Christian Drosten protocol actually started to be misused intentionally as a diagnostic tool and also how a bad PCR-test design can lead to a massive number of false positives, which was actually the pillar of this fake pandemic that is still going on. So now I give the floor to the panel for their closing arguments. Thank you.
Reiner Füllmich
[ 16:05 – 51:00 ]
Thank you very much. Ladies and Gentlemen of the Jury. If any legal case that has ever been brought to the attention of the Jury was a call for justice, it is this one. This case is screaming out for justice to be rendered. This is not a trial, it is not even a mock trial, rather it is a model Grand Jury investigation, designed to show the people and the judiciaries of this world what needs to be done, and how it actually can be done. This model Grand Jury investigation has put all available evidence before the people, and we now ask the Jury for indictments against six representative putative defendants:
Professor Dr. Christian Drosten of Charité University in Berlin;
Dr. Anthony Fauci, head of the NIAID in the United States;
Dr. Tedros of the World Health Organization;
Bill Gates of the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, of GAVI, and many other such vehicles;
Blackrock;
and finally Pfizer
This model investigation does NOT ask for guilty verdicts, but it does ask you, the Jury, to return indictments, against all six putative defendants, based on the evidence that has been presented to us in the course of this proceeding.
My favorite character in a movie about the law is Atticus Finch in To Kill a Mockingbird, played by Gregory Peck, who won an Oscar for his performance as best actor. Up until the very end of his closing argument, the camera never shows him addressing the Jury. And that is because the real Jury were the people who watched that movie, just as in this model proceeding, it is you: our viewers, The People, who are the Jury. And even though I and my esteemed colleagues are unlike Atticus Finch in that movie not asking you to return a verdict, in that case one that saved his wrongly accused client’s life, I do wish to paraphrase part of the last sentence Atticus Finch said to the Jury. “For God’s sake, believe our witnesses.” This is in our opinion the only way we can stop the murderous madness that is taking place all over the world. By looking at the evidence, in particular by listening to the testimonies of our expert witnesses, taking it seriously, and becoming aware of the story of murderous madness that it tells us.
Gregory Peck as Atticus Finch in the 1962 film of To Kill a Mockingbird. Photograph: Universal Pictures/Getty Images
So let us now turn to the evidence. Matthew Ehret, Alex Thompson, Brian Gerrish and Whitney Webb explained to us the historical backdrop to all that has been happening for two and a half years now. The destruction of people’s livelihoods, their health, and their lives. Their testimony tells us one thing very clearly, in particular if you look at the totality of the evidence that is if you see how their testimony connects with that of the other expert witnesses. This is not a pandemic, but it is a plandemic, cooked up by twisted fantasies of super rich megalomaniacs, psychopaths in order to further their ideas of eugenics, and gaining complete control over everything, and everybody. Worse yet, it is eugenics turning into genocide, which many of the main players in this dystopian James Bond movie are pushing. It all started in the 1850s with Charles Darwin and Herbert Spencer talking about the survival of the fittest. Then in the early twentieth century the usual suspects, and Anglo-American oligarchs among them, founded first the British, and then the American eugenics society, whose members believe that some people are simply genetically better than others, and that a selection, a genetic selection, should be made by those psychopaths.
Then came World Wars I and II, which were financed by these very same oligarchs; and after World War II the same people started the Cold War to keep people in fear and in panic mode. Why? Because the ultimate goal of all this is to gain control over all those inferior people through population reduction, and introducing their, their, one-world government, and their one-world bank along with a digital currency controlled by them. At the same time, right after WWII had ended and right before the Nüremberg trials began to deal with the crimes against humanity committed by Hitler, UNESCO was founded. Its first director was the president of the British Eugenics Society, and oddly enough, co-founder of the World Wildlife Fund, Julian Huxley. He gave a speech in which he declared that eugenics had been given a bad name by Hitler’s actions, but that soon he and his fellow eugenicists would be able to talk about eugenics openly again. In 1971 these same people, through their major deep-state tool the CIA, and with the help of Henry Kissinger, had Klaus Schwab found the World Economic Forum in order to influence European politics. In 1992 this conglomerate of super-rich owners of global corporations, politicians and media people founded the World Economic Forum’s Young Global Leaders program, which proceeded to produce the very politicians which we were then to vote into office, among the first to graduate: Angela Merkel and Bill Gates. Current graduates and affiliates include for example Emmanuel Macron, of France; Jacinda Ardern, of New-Zealand; Ursula von der Leyen, of the EU; and Justin Trudeau, of Canada. And Klaus Schwab openly boasts that World Economic Forum has infiltrated half of the Canadian parliament.
Again, the ultimate goal of these people’s megalomaniac fantasies is population control, involving massive population reduction and getting the survivors to agree to two things. One, a one-world government, under the WEF-controlled UN; and two, get the agreement to a one-world digital currency issued by their one-world bank, according to the guidelines of the Chinese social credit system. In order to get there, they need to create as much chaos, fear and panic as possible, so that the people will ultimately give in to their demands. As Herman Göring said when asked how Hitler and he how got the Germans to commit all those unspeakable atrocities, he said: “Fear, that is all that it takes. Fear, regardless of what kind of government you have.”
The two World Wars were hawked [sic] loud wars. They seemed to have given way now to a more subtle and at the same time much more effective silent war: a virus plandemic, which – as it turns out – is still under the control of the military, as we have seen in whistle-blower Brook Jackson’s Pfizer-trial, which all of a sudden revealed that Department of Defense was in charge of the Pfizer medical trial. In that judiciary proceeding, Pfizer’s surprising defense to the allegation of having conducted a sham-trial and having doctored all the numbers, having destroyed their control group, and having withheld the data that shows how dangerous and ineffective their drug was, is “we did not have to follow any rules. We were under a special agreement, a so-called OTA (Other Transaction Authority agreement) with the Department of Defense, to supply them with prototypes.”
The first exercise that led in the direction of the current virus plandemic was, as we learned from retired Lieutenant-Colonel Jim Bush, the military operation Dark Winter, in 2001. Then came Operation Lockstep in 2010 conducted by the Rockefeller Foundation, and finally Event 201, brought to us by the usual suspects, the WEF, the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, and the Johns Hopkins Center for Health Security. This, the idea of waging war through a plandemic, is also how the WHO came into the picture, replacing tanks, rockets and hand grenades as their major tool to create worldwide panic by declaring a pandemic. Or, as they prefer to call it, using a more sophisticated and important sounding phrase, a Public Health Emergency of International Concern, whose acronym is – not by accident, they are laughing at us – pronounced FAKE (PHEIC).
Drs. Stuckelberger and Behrendt, former employees and advisers to the WHO told us that they did not have any cases when they wanted to roll-out their long-planned agenda in early 2020. Therefore, they used the fake German Professor Drosten, who should have lost all credibility during the Swine-flu – which ultimately turned out to be nothing but a mild flu – as his modeling was just as completely devoid of any content to reality as Neil Ferguson‘s from the UK. They had forecast, then as now, hundreds of thousands if not millions of deaths if people don’t get vaccinated. The same Drosten who failed so miserably during the Swine-flu was eager to do their bidding once again. He obliged by creating the cases that they needed for the declaration of a fake Public Health Emergency of International Concern. He first invented the lie of asymptomatic infection, which laid the foundation for indiscriminate mass PCR testing of perfectly healthy people, and then of course, the crucial lie, that his variation of the PCR-test can detect infections. That is it can tell us who is infected with the virus, and therefore dangerous, that is contagious, to others.
Professor Kämmerer, Dr. Peckova, Professor Cahill, and Dr. Mike Yeadon explained in great detail to us that a PCR-test can under no circumstances tell us anything about infections, as it cannot distinguish between dead and live matter, if a person tests positive it may very well be because the test finds the old remnants of the body successful fight against the flu or cold, both of which very frequently contain the corona-virus, and it never finds a whole virus, which is needed for an infection, it only finds fragments, sequences of a virus, as what is taken from the swab is completely destroyed before it goes into the testing machine. Worst of all they told us, brilliant and witty Nobel-prize laureate Kary Mullis’ great scientific tool, the PCR-test was purposefully misused to create cases out of thin air. Drosten, whose variation of the PCR-test, which then served as a blueprint for all other PCR testing and was recommended to the entire world as the gold standard for the detection of infections by the WHO, had set his test at 45 cycles of amplification. Forty-five cycles of amplification, which was literally guaranteed to create cases, but only false-positive ones.
Dr. Mike Yeadon stated, and everyone else from the scientific community confirms this, plus putative defendant Dr. Fauci himself, that at 35 cycles of amplification you end up with roughly 90% false positives. And why did they need these false positive cases at all costs? Dr. Stuckelberger and [Barron] gave us the answer. They needed the cases because they wanted to declare a Public Health Emergency of International Concern, the FAKE, which in turn was the only basis on which they could, according to their own freely invented rules use untested new drugs on people, this means the so-called vaccinations are solely based on these artificially created non-cases. These shots are therefore, as there is no factual basis for them, if you discount the fake cases generated by the help of misuse of the PCR-test, wholly unnecessary. Wholly unnecessary.
Furthermore, as Drs. Bryan Ardis’ and Shankara Chetty’s testimony made clear, there are many alternative, or real methods of treatment, that can easily and safely deal with Covid-19, which is in reality, as even the WHO recognizes, no more dangerous than the common flu. But doctors all over the Western world would be punished by the authorities if they used these effective treatments, such as ivermectin, hydroxychloroquine, vitamin C and D and zinc, etc. But it is even worse. Not only are these shots not necessary, they are neither effective, as evidenced by the examples of Israel and the UK where over 90% of the hospitalized people with covid symptoms are at least twice vaccinated, nor are they safe. As we now know Pfizer did not even conduct real medical trials. They doctored all the numbers and destroyed their own control groups, covering up all the deaths and serious adverse reactions, including systematic sterilization. To emphasize this important point, let me say this again, as Pfizer now claims in the Brook Jackson trial, as a defense they did not have to adhere to any rules under the OTA agreement with the Department of Defense, rather they were only required to show that they can deliver prototypes.
British undertaker John O’Looney explained to us how he too originally believed the official cooked up narrative of a very dangerous pandemic and even tried to help spread it, until he, as an undertaker, saw the incredible damage that the so-called vaccines were doing, in particular to younger people. He also experienced first hand how they actually tried to kill him, by way of getting him when he fell ill, allegedly with covid, to agree to the official treatment protocol, which includes being put on a respirator. Dr. Bryan Ardis confirmed this kind of intentional, in the sense of malicious, systematic malpractice, when he went into the details of the official treatment protocol in the US as ordered by Fauci based on fake studies produced by the WHO. Doctors were told to not use the very safe and effective ivermectin or hydroxychloroquine, but rather use remdesivir, which killed many people in at least two studies that putative defendant Fauci knows about.
READ MORE AND WATCH VIDEO HERE
************
from EuropeReloaded.com
Visit People’s Media at Liberty Rising