The biochemical war on humanity: medical gaslighting explained
Intro by Watchdog
One of the primary methods of attack upon our culture has been the mass-drugging of its citizens designed to incapacitate and stultify its citizen and their present and future leaders.
It is a testimony to our collective strength of character that we have not yet buckled and ceased to advance despite the relentless subversive onslaught against us.
Nevertheless great harm has been done and misery caused by the architects and operatives of such attacks and the time has come for those enemies and their insidious methods to be exposed and the People to be armed with understanding.
In that regard a very fine job is being done by the author of the following article and we highly recommend him.
A Primer on Medical Gaslighting
SOURCE: The Forgotten Side of Medicine
How the institution of medicine covers up the inevitable harms of its unsafe therapeutic toolbox.
In a recent series, I discussed the how unsafe and ineffective the SSRI antidepressants are and how the immense amount of money made from selling depression (and its indefinite “treatment”) to everyone caused effective cures treatments for depression to become almost completely forgotten.
One of the key reasons I focused on this topic on this topic was because psychological torture many individuals go through throughout the psychiatric process is horrific. This is because the psychiatric medications create a wide variety of neurological and psychiatric side effects, but when a patient complains about them, the doctor will often tell the patient those side effects are due to the patient’s pre-existing mental illness rather than being a commonly recognized side effect of the drugs.
Furthermore, since “mentally ill” patients are often deemed to lack the capacity to make their own judgement, whereas psychiatrists are seen as authority figures, I have seen more cases than I can count where everyone (e.g., the patient’s family and the courts [which frequently mandate treatment]) side with the psychiatrist rather than the patient, in turn all insisting those side effects are due to the patient’s mental illness and force the patient to take even more psychiatric drugs.
Note: this gets even more challenging for the patient when they begin to lose their grip on reality from the side effects of the drug and start questioning their own judgement or if they should give up on themselves and just blindly trust the authority figures around them.
Some of the classic ways psychiatry gaslights patients includes:
Telling them any symptom that emerges is due to the pre-existing mental illness.
When a patient experiences adverse effects from a drug, raising the dosage rather than acknowledge the side effects.
Note: this is an story commonly seen immediately preceding catastrophic school shootings, but unfortunately, since there is widespread denial in the psychiatric field that SSRIs can make patients turn psychotic, it is frequently recognized (hence leading to it happening over and over again).When a patient experiences withdrawal reactions (which is very common and one of the most insidious issues with the drugs), telling the patient that those side effects prove the patient “needed” the drug (as it was treating their mental illness) rather than it being recognized a dangerous withdrawal effect.
When a patient develops new psychiatric symptoms (e.g., mania) patient’s are told the drug did not “cause” the symptoms, but rather, that the drug “unmasked” a psychiatric disorder that had always been there (even though it would have never been “unmasked” if the patient had not used the drug in the first place). For example, bipolar disorder, is a debilitating condition which around 25% of longterm SSRI users develop (hence leading to an epidemic of bipolar disorder ever since we started mass medicating with SSRIs), and since it is so common, the “unmasking” story has become the party line most psychiatrists use to rationalize the harm being caused to their patients.
Sadly, gaslighting is not unique to psychiatry. For example, throughout many the clinical trials for many of the more toxic drugs on the market trial participants developed severe side effects, but to ensure the pharmaceutical’s approval, those reactions were hidden both from the trial participants, the government and the clinical trial investigators. For example, in recent article, I detailed the appalling degree to which this was done in:
• The SSRI clinical trials.
• The HPV vaccine trials.
• The COVID vaccine trials.
Note: many were appalled at what whistleblowers shared happened in the COVID vaccine trials (e.g., everyone telling them a clear injury they had wasn’t “real”), but as I tried to illustrate in those articles, these are actually long standing problems in clinical trials (as they cost so much money to conduct, the pharmaceutical sponsors will do everything they can to “prove” the trial showed the drug was “safe and effective).
Since doctors are trained to believe an injury is only “real” (rather than an anecdotal coincidence or simply imagined in the patient’s mind) if the injury is proven to exist within “unbiased” clinical trials, the gaslighting you see in the clinical trials sets of a chain of gaslighting since doctors around the world then believe what the clinical trials showed and dismiss the same injuries in their own patients which were seen in the clinical trials.