When the building with no exits is on fire, what kind of idiot ignores the fire alarm?
AND WHAT KIND OF MANIAC KEEPS RIGHT ON HERDING AS MANY PEOPLE AS POSSIBLE INTO THE BUILDING?
Posted by Steve Cook
Intro by Fabian Ubiquitus.
This featured article is from Uncoverdc.com, which we highly recommend as an excellent resource for info you won’t find in the pathologically untruthfully corporate media.
It gives you a hair-raising insight into the apparent link between the recent sudden sharp rise in infertility, stillbirths and spontaneous abortions and so forth and the vaxadoodle rollout.
Now, as the propagandists for the vaxadoodles are fond of telling us, this might all be a tragic coincidence and the fact that reproductive problems, among many others, started right after the rollout doesn’t PROVE that the vaccines caused the problem.
True enough, but to take an analogy, imagine you are in a building when the fire alarm goes off. The building’s management first try to pretend it isn’t going off. Then when too many people can hear it going off and they cannot deny the fact that it is going off, they insists that its wailing does not of itself PROVE there’s a fire. It could be a malfunction or false alarm but only a moron would ignore it and fail at least to investigate to see if there is a fire. And certainly if you couple a refusal to investigate with an insistence on enticing or herding people into the building, whose fire exits are locked so nobody can leave once they have entered, you would conclude that the building’s management are at best reckless lunatics and at worst homicidal maniacs.
A similarly with the vaxadoodles. Governments not only studiously and willfully ignore the alarm bells of rising infertility, myocarditis, people dropping dead and neglect the obvious rational step of a full fact-finding investigation, they persist in desperately pushing the vaxadoodles. While they do this one has to conclude that we are witnessing willful negligence at the very least and at worst genocidal intent.
Of course the powers that be might have a very compelling reason for not investigating. If we return to the analogy of the fire alarm, an investigation to discover whether there is a fire would also reveal where it is burning, whether it started by accident or arson and, perhaps, WHO caused it it.
All right, so this strongly suggests “something to hide”. But still herding people to the building?
Meanwhile as yet unknown numbers of young people and, indeed, the human race face as yet unknown degrees of fertility problems, stillborn babies and so on. Which is tantamount to us not knowing how many people in the burning building might die. It might not be as bad as we thought, it might be worse than we thought but would it not be reasonable to investigate and find out and in the meantime not shoving anyone else into the ruddy building?
Bear in mind too that this is a building that the vast majority of people have no pressing need to be in at all. For the younger people especially the overall risks of the alleged bug are on a par with a catching a cold.
And when we said “the government” earlier, we mean specific politicians, ministers, bureaucrats and “advisors”, people with names and faces who make the decisions and give the orders.
They must be brought to account before they can bring the futures of millions crashing in flames.